There are 2251 binoculars in our database and 880 owners opinions.
You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side
Search by:
Swarovski NL Pure 10x52
Pictures
Specifications
| Manufacturer | Swarovski |
|---|---|
| Model | NL Pure 10x52 |
| Lens diameter [mm] | 52 |
| Magnification [x] | 10 |
| Angular field of view [deg] | 7.4 |
| Linear field of view [m/m] | 130/1000 |
| Exit pupil [mm] | 5.2 |
| Eye relief [mm] | 17 |
| Min. focusing dist. [m] | 3.3 |
| Twilight factor | 22.8 |
| Brightness | 27.04 |
| Prisms | BaK-4/roof |
| Dimensions [mm] | 174 x 131 x 77 mm |
| Weight [g] | 1020 |
| Waterproof | Yes |
| Nitogen filling | Yes |
| Argon filling | No |
| Image stabilization | No |
| Tripod exit | Yes |
| Focusing | central |
| Warranty [years] | 10 |
| Accesories | Carrying strap, Eyepiece cover, Objective lens cover filler piece, Strap loop connector, Functional side bag, cleaning cloth, soap, brush |
| Price | 16000 |
| Additional information | Announced: June 2024 Waterproof up to 4 m Functional temperature: -25 °C to +55 °C Transmission 91%. |
Owners reviews (1)
Overall
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 3600
User profile: Amateur
Cons: The center focus wheel is not as smooth as the 10X42NL, and it seems that the routing will be a little bit longer.
Pros: From the edge to the edge, very clear, the color saturation is accurate. Even if you observe during the day, you can feel that it is brighter than 1042NL. In the dawn and sunset, this feeling will be very obvious. I don\'t know if it\'s my illusion, from the observation of birds and plants at medium distance, it seems that the three-dimensionality is more obvious compare with 1042NL
Summary: It is very clear and bright, and the chromatic aberration is not visible. As a condition for bird watching in a dark environment, it can perfectly replace 1042NL. It is also very comfortable to hold, and there is no feeling of fatigue after watching birds for a long time. In actual use, there is no difference in field of view from 1042NL.