AllBinos.com

• 
• 
• 
• 

Magnification	Lens diameter	Angular field of view	Prisms	Eye relief	Weight	Price
12	36	87.5/1000(5o)	Porro II	14.5 mm	660 g	3199 PLN
Owners opinions: 0 Specifications

Real front lens diameter	Left:   36.2+/- 0.05 mm Right:  36.2+/- 0.05 mm	8 / 8.0 pkt
Real magnification	12.19+/- 0.05x	3/3.0
Transmission	88+/- 1%	15.5/25.0
Chromatic aberration	Low in the centre, a bit higher than medium on the edge.	7/10.0
Astigmatism	Very low.	8/10.0
Distortion	Distance of the first curved line from the field of view centre compared to the field of view radius: 52% ± 4%	6/10.0
Coma	Starts in a distance of 80-85% of field of view and is between low and medium on the very edge.	9/10.0
Blurring at the edge of the FOV	Blur occurs in a distance of 96.5 ± 3% from the field of view centre.	9.5/10.0
Darkening at the edge the FOV	Slight.	4/5.0
Whiteness of the image	Flat transmission graph. Colouring of images is very slightly yellow-green.	4.4/5.0
Collimation	Perfect.	5/5.0
Internal reflections	Left: Right: A few lighter areas near exit pupils that aren't very intensive.	4.2/5.0
Housing	For a stabilized instrument this pair of binoculars in not big at all – it can be compared to any 40-42 mm class instrument. The smooth rubber armour is made of good quality rubber and it sticks to the body everywhere, even near objectives. Eyepieces are relatively small but they are very comfortable to use. Soft, perhaps even a tad too soft eyecups aren't adjustable but you can fold them without any problems. Produced in Taiwan.	7.5/8.0
Focusing	Small, ribbed central wheel with a range of 440 deg. It moves with very slight resistance – definitelly too loose. The movement of the wheel moves objective lenses. Dioptre correction on the right eyepiece, it moves the outer lens and performs as it should.	3/5.0
Tripod	Lack. Image stabilization.	3/3.0
Interpupilary distance	from 54.2 to 75.2mm	5/6.0
Closest focusing distance	6.25 meters.	1.5/2.0
Eyepieces FOV	Apparent field of view of 59.3 deg (simplified formula) and 54.7 deg (tangent formula).	10/20.0
Field of view	Measured by us amounted to 4.86 +\- 0.04 deg and was a bit narrower than stated in official specifications.	5/8.0
Quality of the interior of the barrels	Inner tubes are dark gray and most of their surface is densely ribbed. Deeper you can notice some brighter parts. Grey bottom. Clean.	4/5.0
Vignetting	Left: Right: OL: 1.57% OR: 1.61%	6/8.0
Prisms quality	High quality BaK-4.	8/8.0
Antireflection coatings	Green-yellow-pink on objective lenses, pink-purple on the prisms, green-yellow-pink on the eyepieces. Low intensity.	5/5.0
Warranty [years]	2	2/6.0
Final result	75.6%	143.6 / 190 pkt
Econo result		0pkt.

Summary

Pros:

• solid casing,
• sensible correction of chromatic aberration,
• very low astigmatism,
• excellent coma correction,
• sharp images almost to the very edge of the field of view,
• slight brightness loss on edges of the field,
• very good white balance,
• dark areas around exit pupils,
• good blackening and cleanliness inside the tubes,
• efficient Porro II prisms made of BaK-4 glass,
• efficient and effective image stabilization.

Cons:

• such an optical system should have provided a trasmission that exceeds 90%,
• short warranty period,
• not especially circular exit pupils.

Let's start with a pleasant surprise. I've always considered stabilized binoculars to be rather stationary instruments, designed to be kept and used on a terrace or a balcony so you can admire the nature arround you or areoplanes.

The physical dimensions of the Canon 12x36 IS III and its weight, amounting to just 660 grams, make it similar to any 40-42 mm class pair of binoculars and they are often companions of our trips. I don't see any reason why the stabilized Canon couldn't be taken along as well.

It can offer you a high, efficiently stabilized magnification, and very good optical properties. We were especially impressed by its resolution, stretching practically across the whole field of view which is rather wide anyway.

As we've already mentioned stabilization, it's worth saying something more about it. First of all, unlike the Fujinon 14x40, there are no bothersome noises when you switch it on. The mechanism is smooth and efficient. We managed to assess its efficiency up to a point because the 12x magnification is for me so undemanding that I can observe things holding the binoculars in my hand without any problems. Still stabilization evidently helps a lot and if you don't have a firm grip you'll certainly appreciate it.

There's a small fly in this excellent ointment, though – it's enough you glance at the transmission graph.

You can praise quite flat shape that guarantees you very good colour rendering but it is slightly worrying that at no point the binoculars reach 90% or higher. Why are we so demanding in this area? Firstly, you deal here with the Porro II system in which the prisms operate on the principle of total internal reflection. To put it simply, there are no losses here. What's more, such a system is not divided with air, unlike some Porro I systems, so the losses can really be minimized. Add to that a 1-element objective lens and a 4-element eyepiece. Overall in the whole binoculars you deal with just 6 optical elements, so 12 air-to-glass surfaces.

The most efficient contemporary multilayer antireflection coatings lose about 0.3% on one air-to-glass surface. With 12 such surfaces the overall loss should amount to about 3.5%. Add to that light absorption factor in glass that, with such a number of elements, shouldn't exceed 2%. As you can see, the overall losses of light should have been about 5.5%; it means that in some parts of the visible spectrum the transmission of this instrument should be able to exceed 94%. The problem is it never exceeds 90% and it's a slip-up that shouldn't have happened to a pair of binoculars manufactured by such a renowned producer and sold at this price point.

As we've already mentioned the price, it's worth adding that currently the Canon binoculars can be bought for about 700-800 Euro at the cheapest. You have to admit the price is rather affordable, especially for a piece of equipment with such good optics and image stabilization. It compensates a bit for too low transmission and it makes this purchase completely recommendable.