Binoculars
There are 1462 binoculars in our database and 138 owners opinions.
You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side
Olympus 12x50 EXPS I
Specifications
| Lens diameter [mm] | 50 |
|---|---|
| Magnification [x] | 12 |
| Angular field of view [deg] | 4.6 |
| Linear field of view [m/m] | 80/1000 |
| Exit pupil [mm] | 4.2 |
| Eye relief [mm] | 18.3 |
| Min. focusing dist. [m] | 6 |
| Twilight factor | 25.5 |
| Brightness | 17.4 |
| Prisms | BaK-4/Porro |
| Dimensions [mm] | 192x163x62 |
| Weight [g] | 910 |
| Waterproof | No |
| Nitogen filling | No |
| Argon filling | No |
| Image stabilization | No |
| Tripod exit | Yes |
| Focusing | central |
| Warranty [years] | 2 |
| Accesories | |
| Price | 999 |
| Additional information |
Average rating (1 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 5.00 |  |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 3.00 |  |
| Accesories and usage | 4.00 | |
| Value for money | 4.00 | |
| Overall | 4.00 | |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Accesories and usage | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since:
Price: 200 E
User profile: Semipro
Cons: 1) The main problem was that I couldn't adjust the diopter of right eye in such a way that it stays constant for all viewing distances. When focused on different distances I felt some difference between eyes. May be caused by diferent magnifications of two barrels? I compared this Olympus to Russian KOMZ 12x45, the latter had wider view and easily achievable diopter correction, but bad flares and contrast in some conditions. 2) A little too heavy. The field of view is a little narrow, but OK. Chromatic aberration can show up very high at the edges, but it is not bothersome imho.
Pros: Solid build, good contrast, good protection from flares, rather handy.
Summary: Try thoroughly before you buy.
