There are 2222 binoculars in our database and 801 owners opinions.
You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side
Search by:
Meopta Meostar B1 10x42
Pictures
Specifications
| Manufacturer | Meopta |
|---|---|
| Model | Meostar B1 10x42 |
| Lens diameter [mm] | 42 |
| Magnification [x] | 10 |
| Angular field of view [deg] | 6.3 |
| Linear field of view [m/m] | 110/1000 |
| Exit pupil [mm] | 4.2 |
| Eye relief [mm] | 15 |
| Min. focusing dist. [m] | 3 |
| Twilight factor | 20.49 |
| Brightness | 17.64 |
| Prisms | BaK-4/roof |
| Dimensions [mm] | 138x130 |
| Weight [g] | 877 |
| Waterproof | Yes |
| Nitogen filling | Yes |
| Argon filling | No |
| Image stabilization | No |
| Tripod exit | Yes |
| Focusing | central |
| Warranty [years] | 3 |
| Accesories | |
| Price | 2890 |
| Additional information |
Owners reviews (2)
Add your opinion
Overall
Owner since: 1 month
Price: $200
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Hefty.. yet built like a tank, definitely.
Pros: Hi. I bought these used and what amazing value! You don’t want to know what I paid but these should retail in their day at $850 CAD. The FOV is incorrectly reported in the article at 110/1000 with angle of view 6.3deg.. while Meopta reports 332’ @1000 yd and 6.3 deg Actual. To compare: 6.9 deg and 362’ on the Vortex razor HD 10x42 @1299.99usd$
Summary: I’m curious if the incorrect summary specifications data are throwing off some of the calculations where low marks were given. I’m hoping to hear of a retest with the correct FOV listed. Thanks!
Overall
Owner since:
Price:
User profile: Semipro
Cons: nothing
Pros: very sharp Picture, easelessness on the eyes, good body ergonomics
Summary: Absolutely I do not understand who did the binocular test here. In my opinion, the quality of the telescope is significantly higher than the purchase price. Excellent binokulars !