.

AllBinos.com

Binoculars

There are 3086 binoculars in our database and 910 owners opinions.

You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side

Search by:

Olympus DPS-I 10x50

Pictures
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
  • Binoculars Olympus DPS-I 10x50
Manufacturer data

Manufacturer:

Olympus
web site

Distribution / Sales:

FOTOZAKUPY.PL
web site
Specifications
Manufacturer Olympus
Model DPS-I 10x50
Lens diameter [mm] 50
Magnification [x] 10
Angular field of view [deg] 6.5
Linear field of view [m/m] 114/1000
Exit pupil [mm] 25
Eye relief [mm] 12
Min. focusing dist. [m] 6
Twilight factor 22.36
Brightness 25
Prisms Bk7/Porro
Dimensions [mm] 191x178x63
Weight [g] 855
Waterproof No
Nitogen filling No
Argon filling No
Image stabilization No
Tripod exit No
Focusing central
Warranty [years] 0
Accesories
Price 399
Additional information
----- advertisement -----

Average rating (6 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Accesories and usage
Value for money

Overall

3.67 Average
Owners reviews (6)
  1. Phil
    Phil 30 May 2021, 02:36
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 125.236.x.x
    Owner since: more than 10 years
    Price: 300
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Field curvature noticeable but well illuminated BK4 prisms action lookout 1 model weight 966 grams. Not all surfaces coated most multicoated but reflected image shows at least 2 surfaces not coated.

    Pros: very sharp easy to use rubber armoured binoculars. Had plenty of use and hold up well. Not as good as my 7 x 50 Zeiss but still not bad. Good for astronomy with some field coma/curvature near the edges.

    Summary: Overall a good pair of binoculars

  2. joe bidy
    joe bidy 9 November 2020, 00:57
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 109.41.x.x
    Owner since: 3 years
    Price: 65 €
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: not suitable for very wide pupillary distance

    Pros: very good optics, in center: very little chromatic aberration good sharpness lightweight, so cheap tripods are ok

    Summary: If you don\'t have the bucks for a zeiss, buy this one.

  3. tonibat
    tonibat 22 January 2019, 12:32
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 139.47.x.x
    Owner since: 1 year
    Price: 90€
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Not waterproof. A little bulky but no heavy.

    Pros: Excellent optics, amazing detail and brightness. Fairly wide view, apparent angle of view 65°. It does have tripod exit, despite the official specification sheet, which has been copied over by reviews.

    Summary: All in all, an amazing binocular at an affordable price.

  4. ionutz
    ionutz 31 May 2015, 06:38
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 109.255.x.x
    Owner since: 5 years
    Price: 112
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Cost was to high for performance.

    Pros: Very bright, ideal in low light and astronomy.

    Summary: good optics, sharp and bright.

  5. haristup
    haristup 1 August 2011, 22:22
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 92.36.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: 90$
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: 1

    Pros: 1

    Summary: not bad ,not impresive,litl more expensive for this qualiti.veri bad coated,but solid for ocasional use.

  6. Samis Gomes
    Samis Gomes 19 June 2011, 18:17
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Accesories and usage
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 200.100.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: $ 65
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: Adjust diotropic no solid, this a little loose.

    Pros: Good optic and construction. Great quality for the money. Focus is good, and image is clarity.

    Summary: And binocular really well built, with excellent finishing, but could have a better eye relief and a fairer adjustment diotropic. It's certainly far better than the Celestron busnhell and sold in the same price range.