There are 2253 binoculars in our database and 894 owners opinions.
You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side
Search by:
Swarovski SLC 8x42 W B
Pictures
Manufacturer data
Specifications
| Manufacturer | Swarovski |
|---|---|
| Model | SLC 8x42 W B |
| Lens diameter [mm] | 42 |
| Magnification [x] | 8 |
| Angular field of view [deg] | 7.8 |
| Linear field of view [m/m] | 136/1000 |
| Exit pupil [mm] | 5.25 |
| Eye relief [mm] | 18.5 |
| Min. focusing dist. [m] | 3.2 |
| Twilight factor | 18.33 |
| Brightness | 27.56 |
| Prisms | BaK-4/roof |
| Dimensions [mm] | 149x120x63 |
| Weight [g] | 810 |
| Waterproof | Yes |
| Nitogen filling | Yes |
| Argon filling | No |
| Image stabilization | No |
| Tripod exit | No |
| Focusing | central |
| Warranty [years] | 10 |
| Accesories | |
| Price | 0 |
| Additional information |
Owners reviews (1)
Overall
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 1470€
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Dry o-ring in focusser caused an annoying squeeking noise and the focusser was not running smooth. Issue resolved by rinsing the binos under the tap with fresh water.
Pros: Killer optics, for me personally the best money can buy. Resolution, contrast, edge sharpness, colors and DOF are second to none. Compact for a 8x42.
Summary: This was my bino of choice after comparing the Zeiss HT, Leica Ultravid HD, and this new Swarovski SLC wb. They all have their strong points, but after all, I liked the optical performance of the SLC best, and that's what counts for me. For looks and natural color rendition, it would have been a GREEN Ultravid HD. For build quality and brightness, it would have been the Zeiss HT. But when I looked though the barrels of the SLC, I was sold. But I'm sure I would have been perfectly happy with the other 2 as well.