The Tasco Essentials 8x42 is one of the cheapest roof prism 42 mm binoculars available on the market - it would be difficult to expect some impressive performance from it. We deal here with Schmidt-Pechan roof prisms coated by aluminum reflective layers. Some of air-to-glass surfaces are covered by simple, onelayer antireflection coatings and some are not covered at all. The producer doesn’t mention any phase coatings on the prisms. The casing is rubberized and waterproof. Buyers get caps, a strap, a cleaning cloth, and a case in the box. The binoculars come with a one-year guarantee.
The distance of the first curved line from the field centre compared to the field of vision radius: 25% +\- 5%
Appears more or less in the distance of 70% of the field of vision radius and is huge on the very edge.
Blurring at the edge of the FOV
The blur occurs in the distance of 80% +\- 5% from the field of vision centre.
Darkening at the edge the FOV
Whiteness of the image
More than a dozen percent of difference between red and blue light. The image is grey-brownish-yellowish.
Quite big and not especially stylish, looking far from solid to boot. Slippery and smelly rubber padding which comes off near objectives. Rubberized and regulated eyecups. Produced in China.
Significantly big and ribbed central wheel with the working range of 560 degrees. It moves very unevenly, sometimes being heavy to turn sometimes working more loosely. Individual focusing on the right eyepiece done by a comfortable ring which moves the outer lens.
There is an exit hidden beneath a screw which also secures objective caps.
from 56.8 to 75.7mm
Closest focusing distance
Apparent field of view of 54.4 degrees.
Field of view
Measured by us amounted to 6.80 +\- 0.03 degrees and it was a bit narrower than stated in the specifications. Not a very impressive field of view for such a class of equipment.
Quality of the interior of the barrels
Black but shiny inner tubes. Grey bottom. Some specks of dust on both prisms.
OL: 4.80%, OR: 3.88%
Good quality BaK-4.
Bluish on the outer lenses of the objectives and eyepieces (look like single-layer ones). On the prisms and the inner part of the objective there are no coatings. Part of air-to-glass surfaces in eyepieces seem not to be covered as well. Medium intensity.
sensibly controlled astigmatism,
prisms made of BaK-4 glass.
very weak transmission,
badly corrected chromatic aberration,
noticeable light fall-off on the edge of the field of view,
truncated exit pupils,
ugly and smelly rubber on the padding,
focusing wheel has some slack,
sharp image from the distance of over 4 meters.
What can be written in the test’s summary of such a pair of binoculars? Is it really necessary to tear apart a piece of equipment which costs just below 100 Euro? The price itself already indicates that the results cannot be good; accordingly the binoculars’ performance is such that you could have tormented it long and hard. We don’t intend to do so. Let’s just focus on a transmission graph, presented below…
It shows unambiguously what class of instrument we are dealing with here. A classic Porro device with the same parameters would have reached a better transmission level even without one single coating. Here, despite single-layer coatings on some air-to-glass surfaces the transmission is still very weak. All of this makes spending alomst 100 Euro on this pair of binoculars a very bad decision. You would make a much better use of that money trying to buy a 8x40 or 8x42 set of Porro binoculars.
This site is not responsible for any damage that the information on this site may cause to your system.
It is illegal to copy or redistribute any information found on this site in any way without the expressed written consent of CO-NET Robert Olech
Wydawcą allbinos.com jest firma CO-NET Robert Olech. Adres wydawcy oraz redakcji: ul. Żwirki i Wigury 11/34 83-000 Pruszcz Gdański