Binoculars
There are 1462 binoculars in our database and 138 owners opinions.
You can also
compare binoculars side-by-side
Specifications
| Lens diameter [mm] | 32 |
|---|---|
| Magnification [x] | 8 |
| Angular field of view [deg] | 7.5 |
| Linear field of view [m/m] | 131/1000 |
| Exit pupil [mm] | 4 |
| Eye relief [mm] | 17.4 |
| Min. focusing dist. [m] | 3 |
| Twilight factor | 16 |
| Brightness | 16 |
| Prisms | BaK-4/porro |
| Dimensions [mm] | 116 x 183 |
| Weight [g] | 630 |
| Waterproof | No |
| Nitogen filling | No |
| Argon filling | No |
| Image stabilization | No |
| Tripod exit | No |
| Focusing | central |
| Warranty [years] | 10 |
| Accesories | |
| Price | 2999 |
| Additional information |
Average rating (4 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 4.50 |   |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 5.00 | |
| Accesories and usage | 4.50 | |
| Value for money | 5.00 | |
| Overall | 4.75 | |
| Build quality |   |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Accesories and usage | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 5 years
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Not waterproof
Pros: The view
Summary: Best glass i have used, ever.I could never afford this optical quality in a roof, assuming it is available in a roof somewhere north of $2000 USD
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Accesories and usage | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 4 years
Price: $550
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Not weatherproof. Rainguard is a bit of a nuisance and doesn't fit well. No status points with the Big 3 roofer crowd (although the SE's preform as well or better than most of their competition).
Pros: Spectacular optics, as good as anything I've seen for almost four times the price.
Summary: Still one of the finest small binoculars made.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Accesories and usage | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: $400 used
User profile: Amateur
Cons: They don't have the newest pull-out eye cups, and with my eyeglasses they have to be centered properly or black out. I'm being very picky.
Pros: Incredible clarity, beautiful 3-D view, flat field, extremely bright for an 8x32, feel very familiar holding them, nice weight.
Summary: I've not looked through many other binos, although had a new Swaro 8x42 SLC-HD for a month. Optically I could see little difference, although the Swarovskis were more eyeglass friendly and sl. wider field. The Swaros were only slightly brighter at dusk and did not have the 3-D view of the Nikon porro. I've also used an Leica 8x32 Trinovid which frankly didn't come close to the Nikon SE 8x32. The Nikon SE's (I've also had a 10x42) are optically superb and feel great. The price is right also.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Accesories and usage | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 7 years
Price: 550
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Not waterproof
Pros: Perfect resolution and color fidelity. "WOW" factor off the charts.
Summary: Best of the Best
